Belarus vs Japan: AFOLU — Direct emissions
AFOLU — Direct emissions over time
- Belarus
- Japan
How they compare
Japan currently reports 17.6 kt against 15.8 kt in Belarus, a difference of 1.8 kt.
That makes Japan's figure about 1.1 times Belarus's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Japan ahead.
Belarus ranks 51st and Japan ranks 48th of 197 countries.
Japan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Japan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 13.6 kt | 22.24 kt | 8.65 kt | Japan |
| 2000s | 13.69 kt | 19.9 kt | 6.21 kt | Japan |
| 2010s | 15.61 kt | 18.09 kt | 2.47 kt | Japan |
| 2020s | 15.4 kt | 17.77 kt | 2.37 kt | Japan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher afolu — direct emissions, Belarus or Japan?
- Japan, at 17.6 kt against 15.8 kt in Belarus as of 2023.
- What is the difference in afolu — direct emissions between Belarus and Japan?
- 1.8 kt, with Japan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Japan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Belarus and Japan rank globally for afolu — direct emissions?
- Belarus ranks 51st and Japan ranks 48th of 197 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as AFOLU — Direct emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf