Democratic Republic of the Congo vs Lao People's Democratic Republic: AFOLU — Direct emissions

Democratic Republic of the Congo
6.19 kt
in 2023
Lao People's Democratic Republic
8.56 kt
in 2023
Democratic Republic of the Congo rank
13th
Lao People's Democratic Republic rank
11th

AFOLU — Direct emissions over time

  • Democratic Republic of the Congo
  • Lao People's Democratic Republic
02468199020062023

How they compare

Lao People's Democratic Republic currently reports 8.56 kt against 6.19 kt in Democratic Republic of the Congo, a difference of 2.37 kt.

That makes Lao People's Democratic Republic's figure about 1.4 times Democratic Republic of the Congo's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Democratic Republic of the Congo ahead.

Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 13th and Lao People's Democratic Republic ranks 11th of 20 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Democratic Republic of the Congo averaged higher in 1 and Lao People's Democratic Republic in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Democratic Republic of the Congo Lao People's Democratic Republic Difference Ahead
1990s 4.16 kt 3.96 kt 0.1948 kt Democratic Republic of the Congo
2000s 3.43 kt 4.71 kt 1.28 kt Lao People's Democratic Republic
2010s 4.43 kt 6.55 kt 2.12 kt Lao People's Democratic Republic
2020s 5.64 kt 7.94 kt 2.3 kt Lao People's Democratic Republic

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher afolu — direct emissions, Democratic Republic of the Congo or Lao People's Democratic Republic?
Lao People's Democratic Republic, at 8.56 kt against 6.19 kt in Democratic Republic of the Congo as of 2023.
What is the difference in afolu — direct emissions between Democratic Republic of the Congo and Lao People's Democratic Republic?
2.37 kt, with Lao People's Democratic Republic ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic Republic of the Congo and Lao People's Democratic Republic?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Democratic Republic of the Congo and Lao People's Democratic Republic rank globally for afolu — direct emissions?
Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 13th and Lao People's Democratic Republic ranks 11th of 20 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as AFOLU — Direct emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Democratic Republic of the Congo vs Lao People's Democratic Republic: AFOLU — Direct emissions. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/afolu-direct-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/democratic-republic-of-the-congo/lao-people-s-democratic-republic/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/afolu-direct-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/democratic-republic-of-the-congo/lao-people-s-democratic-republic/">Democratic Republic of the Congo vs Lao People's Democratic Republic: AFOLU — Direct emissions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
AFOLU — Direct emissions (N2O)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
249 places, 8,204 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf