Libya vs Rwanda: AFOLU — Direct emissions
AFOLU — Direct emissions over time
- Libya
- Rwanda
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 3.45 kt against 3.26 kt in Libya, a difference of 0.19 kt.
That makes Rwanda's figure about 1.1 times Libya's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Libya ahead.
Libya ranks 112th and Rwanda ranks 111th of 194 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Libya averaged higher in 2 and Rwanda in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Libya | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2.41 kt | 1.27 kt | 1.14 kt | Libya |
| 2000s | 2.72 kt | 2.33 kt | 0.3851 kt | Libya |
| 2010s | 3.28 kt | 3.66 kt | 0.3783 kt | Rwanda |
| 2020s | 3.21 kt | 3.73 kt | 0.5237 kt | Rwanda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher afolu — direct emissions, Libya or Rwanda?
- Rwanda, at 3.45 kt against 3.26 kt in Libya as of 2023.
- What is the difference in afolu — direct emissions between Libya and Rwanda?
- 0.19 kt, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Rwanda?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Libya and Rwanda rank globally for afolu — direct emissions?
- Libya ranks 112th and Rwanda ranks 111th of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as AFOLU — Direct emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf