Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Russian Federation: AFOLU — Direct emissions

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
810.47 kt
in 2023
Russian Federation
102.67 kt
in 2023
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank
10th
Russian Federation rank
12th

AFOLU — Direct emissions over time

  • Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
  • Russian Federation
0200400600800199020062023

How they compare

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) currently reports 810.47 kt against 102.67 kt in Russian Federation, a difference of 707.8 kt.

That makes Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)'s figure about 7.9 times Russian Federation's.

Across all 32 years both countries report, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) has been ahead every year.

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 10th and Russian Federation ranks 12th of 32 groups.

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) Russian Federation Difference Ahead
1990s 388.49 kt 111.22 kt 277.27 kt Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2000s 486.18 kt 77.49 kt 408.69 kt Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2010s 658.1 kt 83.26 kt 574.84 kt Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2020s 785.59 kt 100.52 kt 685.07 kt Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher afolu — direct emissions, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) or Russian Federation?
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), at 810.47 kt against 102.67 kt in Russian Federation as of 2023.
What is the difference in afolu — direct emissions between Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Russian Federation?
707.8 kt, with Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Russian Federation?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Russian Federation rank globally for afolu — direct emissions?
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 10th and Russian Federation ranks 12th of 32 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as AFOLU — Direct emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Russian Federation: AFOLU — Direct emissions. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/afolu-direct-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/russian-federation-2/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/afolu-direct-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/russian-federation-2/">Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Russian Federation: AFOLU — Direct emissions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
AFOLU — Direct emissions (N2O)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
249 places, 8,204 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf