Peru vs Uruguay: AFOLU — Direct emissions
AFOLU — Direct emissions over time
- Peru
- Uruguay
How they compare
Uruguay currently reports 21.08 kt against 20.8 kt in Peru, a difference of 0.28 kt.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Uruguay ahead.
Peru ranks 45th and Uruguay ranks 44th of 197 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Peru averaged higher in 2 and Uruguay in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Peru | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 14.47 kt | 18.09 kt | 3.62 kt | Uruguay |
| 2000s | 18.75 kt | 19.1 kt | 0.351 kt | Uruguay |
| 2010s | 20.73 kt | 20.51 kt | 0.2182 kt | Peru |
| 2020s | 21.59 kt | 21.08 kt | 0.5128 kt | Peru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher afolu — direct emissions, Peru or Uruguay?
- Uruguay, at 21.08 kt against 20.8 kt in Peru as of 2023.
- What is the difference in afolu — direct emissions between Peru and Uruguay?
- 0.28 kt, with Uruguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Peru and Uruguay?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Peru and Uruguay rank globally for afolu — direct emissions?
- Peru ranks 45th and Uruguay ranks 44th of 197 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as AFOLU — Direct emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf