Philippines vs South Sudan: AFOLU — Direct emissions
AFOLU — Direct emissions over time
- Philippines
- South Sudan
How they compare
South Sudan currently reports 29.25 kt against 28.3 kt in Philippines, a difference of 0.95 kt.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was South Sudan ahead.
Philippines ranks 38th and South Sudan ranks 36th of 197 countries.
Philippines has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Philippines | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 27.21 kt | 26.05 kt | 1.16 kt | Philippines |
| 2020s | 29.43 kt | 28.7 kt | 0.7355 kt | Philippines |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher afolu — direct emissions, Philippines or South Sudan?
- South Sudan, at 29.25 kt against 28.3 kt in Philippines as of 2023.
- What is the difference in afolu — direct emissions between Philippines and South Sudan?
- 0.95 kt, with South Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Philippines and South Sudan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Philippines and South Sudan rank globally for afolu — direct emissions?
- Philippines ranks 38th and South Sudan ranks 36th of 197 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as AFOLU — Direct emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf