Australia and New Zealand vs Democratic Republic of the Congo: AFOLU — Emissions (CO2eq)

Australia and New Zealand
238,347 kt
in 2023
Democratic Republic of the Congo
205,125 kt
in 2023
Australia and New Zealand rank
5th
Democratic Republic of the Congo rank
8th

AFOLU — Emissions (CO2eq) over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • Democratic Republic of the Congo
100.0k200.0k300.0k400.0k500.0k600.0k199020062023

How they compare

Australia and New Zealand currently reports 238,347 kt against 205,125 kt in Democratic Republic of the Congo, a difference of 33,222 kt.

That makes Australia and New Zealand's figure about 1.2 times Democratic Republic of the Congo's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Democratic Republic of the Congo ahead.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 5th and Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 8th of 257 countries.

Democratic Republic of the Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand Democratic Republic of the Congo Difference Ahead
1990s 252,886 kt 423,300 kt 170,414 kt Democratic Republic of the Congo
2000s 263,988 kt 424,827 kt 160,839 kt Democratic Republic of the Congo
2010s 179,734 kt 433,281 kt 253,547 kt Democratic Republic of the Congo
2020s 170,220 kt 209,206 kt 38,986 kt Democratic Republic of the Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher afolu — emissions (co2eq), Australia and New Zealand or Democratic Republic of the Congo?
Australia and New Zealand, at 238,347 kt against 205,125 kt in Democratic Republic of the Congo as of 2023.
What is the difference in afolu — emissions (co2eq) between Australia and New Zealand and Democratic Republic of the Congo?
33,222 kt, with Australia and New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Democratic Republic of the Congo?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Australia and New Zealand and Democratic Republic of the Congo rank globally for afolu — emissions (co2eq)?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 5th and Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 8th of 257 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as AFOLU — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs Democratic Republic of the Congo: AFOLU — Emissions (CO2eq). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/afolu-emissions-co2eq-ar5-fao-tier-1/australia-and-new-zealand/democratic-republic-of-the-congo/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/afolu-emissions-co2eq-ar5-fao-tier-1/australia-and-new-zealand/democratic-republic-of-the-congo/">Australia and New Zealand vs Democratic Republic of the Congo: AFOLU — Emissions (CO2eq)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
AFOLU — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
291 places, 9,669 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf