Belgium-Luxembourg vs Dominican Republic: AFOLU — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5)
AFOLU — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) over time
- Belgium-Luxembourg
- Dominican Republic
How they compare
Dominican Republic currently reports 8,759 kt against 8,321 kt in Belgium-Luxembourg, a difference of 438 kt.
That makes Dominican Republic's figure about 1.1 times Belgium-Luxembourg's.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Belgium-Luxembourg has been ahead every year.
Belgium-Luxembourg ranks 104th and Dominican Republic ranks 101st of 257 countries.
Belgium-Luxembourg has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher afolu — emissions (co2eq), Belgium-Luxembourg or Dominican Republic?
- Dominican Republic, at 8,759 kt against 8,321 kt in Belgium-Luxembourg as of 2023.
- What is the difference in afolu — emissions (co2eq) between Belgium-Luxembourg and Dominican Republic?
- 438 kt, with Dominican Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium-Luxembourg and Dominican Republic?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 1999.
- How do Belgium-Luxembourg and Dominican Republic rank globally for afolu — emissions (co2eq)?
- Belgium-Luxembourg ranks 104th and Dominican Republic ranks 101st of 257 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as AFOLU — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf