Belgium vs Latvia: AFOLU — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5)
AFOLU — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) over time
- Belgium
- Latvia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 9,468 kt against 9,111 kt in Belgium, a difference of 357 kt.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Belgium ahead.
Belgium ranks 99th and Latvia ranks 98th of 257 countries.
Belgium has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 7,424 kt | -8,240 kt | 15,664 kt | Belgium |
| 2010s | 9,763 kt | -281.86 kt | 10,045 kt | Belgium |
| 2020s | 10,257 kt | 7,452 kt | 2,806 kt | Belgium |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher afolu — emissions (co2eq), Belgium or Latvia?
- Latvia, at 9,468 kt against 9,111 kt in Belgium as of 2023.
- What is the difference in afolu — emissions (co2eq) between Belgium and Latvia?
- 357 kt, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Latvia?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Belgium and Latvia rank globally for afolu — emissions (co2eq)?
- Belgium ranks 99th and Latvia ranks 98th of 257 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as AFOLU — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf