Benin vs Malawi: AFOLU — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5)
AFOLU — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) over time
- Benin
- Malawi
How they compare
Benin currently reports 19,540 kt against 18,782 kt in Malawi, a difference of 758 kt.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Malawi ahead.
Benin ranks 78th and Malawi ranks 79th of 257 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Benin averaged higher in 3 and Malawi in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Benin | Malawi | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -389.27 kt | 10,520 kt | 10,910 kt | Malawi |
| 2000s | 40,673 kt | 11,341 kt | 29,332 kt | Benin |
| 2010s | 34,126 kt | 14,280 kt | 19,846 kt | Benin |
| 2020s | 19,079 kt | 17,649 kt | 1,430 kt | Benin |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher afolu — emissions (co2eq), Benin or Malawi?
- Benin, at 19,540 kt against 18,782 kt in Malawi as of 2023.
- What is the difference in afolu — emissions (co2eq) between Benin and Malawi?
- 758 kt, with Benin ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Benin and Malawi?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Benin and Malawi rank globally for afolu — emissions (co2eq)?
- Benin ranks 78th and Malawi ranks 79th of 257 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as AFOLU — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf