Bolivia (Plurinational State of) vs Democratic Republic of the Congo: AFOLU — Emissions (CO2eq)

Bolivia (Plurinational State of)
104,698 kt
in 2023
Democratic Republic of the Congo
205,125 kt
in 2023
Bolivia (Plurinational State of) rank
6th
Democratic Republic of the Congo rank
4th

AFOLU — Emissions (CO2eq) over time

  • Bolivia (Plurinational State of)
  • Democratic Republic of the Congo
0200.0k400.0k600.0k199020062023

How they compare

Democratic Republic of the Congo currently reports 205,125 kt against 104,698 kt in Bolivia (Plurinational State of), a difference of 100,427 kt.

That makes Democratic Republic of the Congo's figure about 2.0 times Bolivia (Plurinational State of)'s.

Across all 34 years both countries report, Democratic Republic of the Congo has been ahead every year.

Bolivia (Plurinational State of) ranks 6th and Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 4th of 22 countries.

Democratic Republic of the Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bolivia (Plurinational State of) Democratic Republic of the Congo Difference Ahead
1990s 95,906 kt 423,300 kt 327,393 kt Democratic Republic of the Congo
2000s 73,474 kt 424,827 kt 351,354 kt Democratic Republic of the Congo
2010s 82,115 kt 433,281 kt 351,166 kt Democratic Republic of the Congo
2020s 101,626 kt 209,206 kt 107,580 kt Democratic Republic of the Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher afolu — emissions (co2eq), Bolivia (Plurinational State of) or Democratic Republic of the Congo?
Democratic Republic of the Congo, at 205,125 kt against 104,698 kt in Bolivia (Plurinational State of) as of 2023.
What is the difference in afolu — emissions (co2eq) between Bolivia (Plurinational State of) and Democratic Republic of the Congo?
100,427 kt, with Democratic Republic of the Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bolivia (Plurinational State of) and Democratic Republic of the Congo?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Bolivia (Plurinational State of) and Democratic Republic of the Congo rank globally for afolu — emissions (co2eq)?
Bolivia (Plurinational State of) ranks 6th and Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 4th of 22 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as AFOLU — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bolivia (Plurinational State of) vs Democratic Republic of the Congo: AFOLU — Emissions (CO2eq). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/afolu-emissions-co2eq-ar5-fao-tier-1/bolivia-plurinational-state-of/democratic-republic-of-the-congo/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/afolu-emissions-co2eq-ar5-fao-tier-1/bolivia-plurinational-state-of/democratic-republic-of-the-congo/">Bolivia (Plurinational State of) vs Democratic Republic of the Congo: AFOLU — Emissions (CO2eq)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
AFOLU — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
276 places, 9,163 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf