Bolivia (Plurinational State of) vs United Republic of Tanzania: AFOLU — Emissions (CO2eq)

Bolivia (Plurinational State of)
104,698 kt
in 2023
United Republic of Tanzania
144,556 kt
in 2023
Bolivia (Plurinational State of) rank
23rd
United Republic of Tanzania rank
12th

AFOLU — Emissions (CO2eq) over time

  • Bolivia (Plurinational State of)
  • United Republic of Tanzania
050.0k100.0k150.0k199020062023

How they compare

United Republic of Tanzania currently reports 144,556 kt against 104,698 kt in Bolivia (Plurinational State of), a difference of 39,858 kt.

That makes United Republic of Tanzania's figure about 1.4 times Bolivia (Plurinational State of)'s.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was United Republic of Tanzania ahead.

Bolivia (Plurinational State of) ranks 23rd and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 12th of 257 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Bolivia (Plurinational State of) averaged higher in 1 and United Republic of Tanzania in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bolivia (Plurinational State of) United Republic of Tanzania Difference Ahead
1990s 95,906 kt 95,153 kt 752.97 kt Bolivia (Plurinational State of)
2000s 73,474 kt 107,369 kt 33,895 kt United Republic of Tanzania
2010s 82,115 kt 126,256 kt 44,141 kt United Republic of Tanzania
2020s 101,626 kt 143,534 kt 41,909 kt United Republic of Tanzania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher afolu — emissions (co2eq), Bolivia (Plurinational State of) or United Republic of Tanzania?
United Republic of Tanzania, at 144,556 kt against 104,698 kt in Bolivia (Plurinational State of) as of 2023.
What is the difference in afolu — emissions (co2eq) between Bolivia (Plurinational State of) and United Republic of Tanzania?
39,858 kt, with United Republic of Tanzania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bolivia (Plurinational State of) and United Republic of Tanzania?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Bolivia (Plurinational State of) and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for afolu — emissions (co2eq)?
Bolivia (Plurinational State of) ranks 23rd and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 12th of 257 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as AFOLU — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bolivia (Plurinational State of) vs United Republic of Tanzania: AFOLU — Emissions (CO2eq). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/afolu-emissions-co2eq-ar5-fao-tier-1/bolivia-plurinational-state-of/united-republic-of-tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/afolu-emissions-co2eq-ar5-fao-tier-1/bolivia-plurinational-state-of/united-republic-of-tanzania/">Bolivia (Plurinational State of) vs United Republic of Tanzania: AFOLU — Emissions (CO2eq)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
AFOLU — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
291 places, 9,669 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf