Chad vs Mexico: AFOLU — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5)
AFOLU — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) over time
- Chad
- Mexico
How they compare
Mexico currently reports 120,608 kt against 117,047 kt in Chad, a difference of 3,561 kt.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Mexico ahead.
Chad ranks 21st and Mexico ranks 20th of 257 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Chad averaged higher in 1 and Mexico in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chad | Mexico | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 33,582 kt | 114,915 kt | 81,333 kt | Mexico |
| 2000s | 51,832 kt | 37,003 kt | 14,828 kt | Chad |
| 2010s | 82,830 kt | 87,851 kt | 5,020 kt | Mexico |
| 2020s | 110,019 kt | 118,908 kt | 8,890 kt | Mexico |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher afolu — emissions (co2eq), Chad or Mexico?
- Mexico, at 120,608 kt against 117,047 kt in Chad as of 2023.
- What is the difference in afolu — emissions (co2eq) between Chad and Mexico?
- 3,561 kt, with Mexico ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Mexico?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Chad and Mexico rank globally for afolu — emissions (co2eq)?
- Chad ranks 21st and Mexico ranks 20th of 257 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as AFOLU — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf