Croatia vs Japan: AFOLU — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5)
AFOLU — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) over time
- Croatia
- Japan
How they compare
Croatia currently reports -1,767 kt against -2,242 kt in Japan, a difference of 475 kt.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Croatia has been ahead every year.
Croatia ranks 242nd and Japan ranks 243rd of 257 countries.
Croatia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Croatia | Japan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2,470 kt | -46,694 kt | 49,163 kt | Croatia |
| 2000s | 2,491 kt | -120,970 kt | 123,461 kt | Croatia |
| 2010s | -12.11 kt | -52,159 kt | 52,146 kt | Croatia |
| 2020s | -1,768 kt | -10,810 kt | 9,042 kt | Croatia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher afolu — emissions (co2eq), Croatia or Japan?
- Croatia, at -1,767 kt against -2,242 kt in Japan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in afolu — emissions (co2eq) between Croatia and Japan?
- 475 kt, with Croatia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Japan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Croatia and Japan rank globally for afolu — emissions (co2eq)?
- Croatia ranks 242nd and Japan ranks 243rd of 257 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as AFOLU — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf