Gibraltar vs Guam: AFOLU — Emissions (CO2eq)
AFOLU — Emissions (CO2eq) over time
- Gibraltar
- Guam
How they compare
Gibraltar currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Guam, a difference of 0 kt.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Gibraltar ahead.
Gibraltar ranks 179th and Guam ranks 179th of 222 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Gibraltar averaged higher in 2 and Guam in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Gibraltar | Guam | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.1773 kt | 0 kt | 0.1773 kt | Gibraltar |
| 2000s | 0.0008 kt | 0 kt | 0.0008 kt | Gibraltar |
| 2010s | 0 kt | 150.33 kt | 150.33 kt | Guam |
| 2020s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher afolu — emissions (co2eq), Gibraltar or Guam?
- Gibraltar, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Guam as of 2023.
- What is the difference in afolu — emissions (co2eq) between Gibraltar and Guam?
- 0 kt, with Gibraltar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Gibraltar and Guam?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Gibraltar and Guam rank globally for afolu — emissions (co2eq)?
- Gibraltar ranks 179th and Guam ranks 179th of 222 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as AFOLU — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf