Luxembourg vs Qatar: AFOLU — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5)
AFOLU — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) over time
- Luxembourg
- Qatar
How they compare
Qatar currently reports 636.02 kt against 620.94 kt in Luxembourg, a difference of 15.08 kt.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Qatar ahead.
Luxembourg ranks 159th and Qatar ranks 157th of 257 countries.
Qatar has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Luxembourg | Qatar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 118.27 kt | 165.29 kt | 47.02 kt | Qatar |
| 2010s | 387.3 kt | 427.16 kt | 39.86 kt | Qatar |
| 2020s | 573.48 kt | 664.61 kt | 91.13 kt | Qatar |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher afolu — emissions (co2eq), Luxembourg or Qatar?
- Qatar, at 636.02 kt against 620.94 kt in Luxembourg as of 2023.
- What is the difference in afolu — emissions (co2eq) between Luxembourg and Qatar?
- 15.08 kt, with Qatar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Luxembourg and Qatar?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Luxembourg and Qatar rank globally for afolu — emissions (co2eq)?
- Luxembourg ranks 159th and Qatar ranks 157th of 257 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as AFOLU — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf