Mali vs South Sudan: AFOLU — Emissions (CO2eq)
AFOLU — Emissions (CO2eq) over time
- Mali
- South Sudan
How they compare
Mali currently reports 64,041 kt against 58,234 kt in South Sudan, a difference of 5,807 kt.
That makes Mali's figure about 1.1 times South Sudan's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was South Sudan ahead.
Mali ranks 30th and South Sudan ranks 33rd of 222 countries.
Mali has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mali | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 58,840 kt | 57,606 kt | 1,234 kt | Mali |
| 2020s | 62,772 kt | 59,257 kt | 3,515 kt | Mali |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher afolu — emissions (co2eq), Mali or South Sudan?
- Mali, at 64,041 kt against 58,234 kt in South Sudan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in afolu — emissions (co2eq) between Mali and South Sudan?
- 5,807 kt, with Mali ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mali and South Sudan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Mali and South Sudan rank globally for afolu — emissions (co2eq)?
- Mali ranks 30th and South Sudan ranks 33rd of 222 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as AFOLU — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf