Australia and New Zealand vs Democratic Republic of the Congo: AFOLU — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O

Australia and New Zealand
101,410 kt
in 2023
Democratic Republic of the Congo
22,429 kt
in 2023
Australia and New Zealand rank
7th
Democratic Republic of the Congo rank
26th

AFOLU — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • Democratic Republic of the Congo
20.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k100.0k199020062023

How they compare

Australia and New Zealand currently reports 101,410 kt against 22,429 kt in Democratic Republic of the Congo, a difference of 78,981 kt.

That makes Australia and New Zealand's figure about 4.5 times Democratic Republic of the Congo's.

Across all 34 years both countries report, Australia and New Zealand has been ahead every year.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 7th and Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 26th of 257 countries.

Australia and New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand Democratic Republic of the Congo Difference Ahead
1990s 77,767 kt 20,671 kt 57,096 kt Australia and New Zealand
2000s 80,703 kt 24,700 kt 56,003 kt Australia and New Zealand
2010s 76,529 kt 27,039 kt 49,490 kt Australia and New Zealand
2020s 72,679 kt 24,428 kt 48,251 kt Australia and New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher afolu — emissions (co2eq) from n2o, Australia and New Zealand or Democratic Republic of the Congo?
Australia and New Zealand, at 101,410 kt against 22,429 kt in Democratic Republic of the Congo as of 2023.
What is the difference in afolu — emissions (co2eq) from n2o between Australia and New Zealand and Democratic Republic of the Congo?
78,981 kt, with Australia and New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Democratic Republic of the Congo?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Australia and New Zealand and Democratic Republic of the Congo rank globally for afolu — emissions (co2eq) from n2o?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 7th and Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 26th of 257 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as AFOLU — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs Democratic Republic of the Congo: AFOLU — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/afolu-emissions-co2eq-from-n2o-ar5-fao-tier-1/australia-and-new-zealand/democratic-republic-of-the-congo/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/afolu-emissions-co2eq-from-n2o-ar5-fao-tier-1/australia-and-new-zealand/democratic-republic-of-the-congo/">Australia and New Zealand vs Democratic Republic of the Congo: AFOLU — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
AFOLU — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
291 places, 9,669 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf