Australia and New Zealand vs Least Developed Countries (LDCs): AFOLU — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5)

Australia and New Zealand
101,410 kt
in 2023
Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
382,291 kt
in 2023
Australia and New Zealand rank
7th
Least Developed Countries (LDCs) rank
8th

AFOLU — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
100.0k200.0k300.0k400.0k199020062023

How they compare

Least Developed Countries (LDCs) currently reports 382,291 kt against 101,410 kt in Australia and New Zealand, a difference of 280,881 kt.

That makes Least Developed Countries (LDCs)'s figure about 3.8 times Australia and New Zealand's.

Across all 34 years both countries report, Least Developed Countries (LDCs) has been ahead every year.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 7th and Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ranks 8th of 257 countries.

Least Developed Countries (LDCs) has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand Least Developed Countries (LDCs) Difference Ahead
1990s 77,767 kt 245,158 kt 167,390 kt Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
2000s 80,703 kt 303,654 kt 222,952 kt Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
2010s 76,529 kt 367,638 kt 291,108 kt Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
2020s 72,679 kt 384,846 kt 312,167 kt Least Developed Countries (LDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher afolu — emissions (co2eq) from n2o, Australia and New Zealand or Least Developed Countries (LDCs)?
Least Developed Countries (LDCs), at 382,291 kt against 101,410 kt in Australia and New Zealand as of 2023.
What is the difference in afolu — emissions (co2eq) from n2o between Australia and New Zealand and Least Developed Countries (LDCs)?
280,881 kt, with Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Least Developed Countries (LDCs)?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Australia and New Zealand and Least Developed Countries (LDCs) rank globally for afolu — emissions (co2eq) from n2o?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 7th and Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ranks 8th of 257 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as AFOLU — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs Least Developed Countries (LDCs): AFOLU — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/afolu-emissions-co2eq-from-n2o-ar5-fao-tier-1/australia-and-new-zealand/least-developed-countries-ldcs/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/afolu-emissions-co2eq-from-n2o-ar5-fao-tier-1/australia-and-new-zealand/least-developed-countries-ldcs/">Australia and New Zealand vs Least Developed Countries (LDCs): AFOLU — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
AFOLU — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
291 places, 9,669 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf