Benin vs Serbia: AFOLU — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5)
AFOLU — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) over time
- Benin
- Serbia
How they compare
Benin currently reports 2,733 kt against 2,715 kt in Serbia, a difference of 18 kt.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Serbia ahead.
Benin ranks 110th and Serbia ranks 111th of 257 countries.
Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Benin | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1,738 kt | 3,193 kt | 1,455 kt | Serbia |
| 2010s | 1,968 kt | 2,798 kt | 829.82 kt | Serbia |
| 2020s | 2,505 kt | 2,669 kt | 164.62 kt | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher afolu — emissions (co2eq) from n2o, Benin or Serbia?
- Benin, at 2,733 kt against 2,715 kt in Serbia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in afolu — emissions (co2eq) from n2o between Benin and Serbia?
- 18 kt, with Benin ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Benin and Serbia?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Benin and Serbia rank globally for afolu — emissions (co2eq) from n2o?
- Benin ranks 110th and Serbia ranks 111th of 257 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as AFOLU — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf