Congo vs Slovenia: AFOLU — Emissions (N2O), per capita
Congo
0 kt per person
in 2023
Slovenia
0 kt per person
in 2023
Congo rank
87th
Slovenia rank
85th
AFOLU — Emissions (N2O), per capita over time
- Congo
- Slovenia
How they compare
Slovenia currently reports 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Congo, a difference of 0 kt per person.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Congo ahead.
Congo ranks 87th and Slovenia ranks 85th of 201 countries.
Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Slovenia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Congo |
| 2000s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Congo |
| 2010s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Congo |
| 2020s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher afolu — emissions (n2o), per capita, Congo or Slovenia?
- Slovenia, at 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Congo as of 2023.
- What is the difference in afolu — emissions (n2o), per capita between Congo and Slovenia?
- 0 kt per person, with Slovenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Slovenia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Congo and Slovenia rank globally for afolu — emissions (n2o), per capita?
- Congo ranks 87th and Slovenia ranks 85th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as AFOLU — Emissions (N2O), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
AFOLU — Emissions (N2O) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.