Mauritania vs Norway: AFOLU — Emissions per capita
Mauritania
2.03 t CO2eq/cap
in 2023
Norway
1.91 t CO2eq/cap
in 2023
Mauritania rank
50th
Norway rank
52nd
AFOLU — Emissions per capita over time
- Mauritania
- Norway
How they compare
Mauritania currently reports 2.03 t CO2eq/cap against 1.91 t CO2eq/cap in Norway, a difference of 0.12 t CO2eq/cap.
That makes Mauritania's figure about 1.1 times Norway's.
Across all 34 years both countries report, Mauritania has been ahead every year.
Mauritania ranks 50th and Norway ranks 52nd of 209 countries.
Mauritania has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritania | Norway | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2.64 t CO2eq/cap | -1.26 t CO2eq/cap | 3.89 t CO2eq/cap | Mauritania |
| 2000s | 2.69 t CO2eq/cap | -2.72 t CO2eq/cap | 5.41 t CO2eq/cap | Mauritania |
| 2010s | 2.33 t CO2eq/cap | -1.09 t CO2eq/cap | 3.42 t CO2eq/cap | Mauritania |
| 2020s | 2.09 t CO2eq/cap | 1.54 t CO2eq/cap | 0.5475 t CO2eq/cap | Mauritania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher afolu — emissions per capita, Mauritania or Norway?
- Mauritania, at 2.03 t CO2eq/cap against 1.91 t CO2eq/cap in Norway as of 2023.
- What is the difference in afolu — emissions per capita between Mauritania and Norway?
- 0.12 t CO2eq/cap, with Mauritania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritania and Norway?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Mauritania and Norway rank globally for afolu — emissions per capita?
- Mauritania ranks 50th and Norway ranks 52nd of 209 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as AFOLU — Emissions per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions indicators disseminates indicators on sectoral shares of total national greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions as well as three indicators of emissions intensity: per capita emissions; emissions per value of agricultural production; and emissions per area of agricultural land.