Australia vs Democratic Republic of the Congo: AFOLU — Indirect emissions

Australia
46.25 kt
in 2023
Democratic Republic of the Congo
2.42 kt
in 2023
Australia rank
9th
Democratic Republic of the Congo rank
12th

AFOLU — Indirect emissions over time

  • Australia
  • Democratic Republic of the Congo
0204060199020062023

How they compare

Australia currently reports 46.25 kt against 2.42 kt in Democratic Republic of the Congo, a difference of 43.83 kt.

That makes Australia's figure about 19.1 times Democratic Republic of the Congo's.

Across all 34 years both countries report, Australia has been ahead every year.

Australia ranks 9th and Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 12th of 192 countries.

Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Democratic Republic of the Congo Difference Ahead
1990s 57.46 kt 1.94 kt 55.52 kt Australia
2000s 49.6 kt 1.64 kt 47.96 kt Australia
2010s 42.9 kt 1.88 kt 41.02 kt Australia
2020s 41.56 kt 2.26 kt 39.3 kt Australia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher afolu — indirect emissions, Australia or Democratic Republic of the Congo?
Australia, at 46.25 kt against 2.42 kt in Democratic Republic of the Congo as of 2023.
What is the difference in afolu — indirect emissions between Australia and Democratic Republic of the Congo?
43.83 kt, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Democratic Republic of the Congo?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Australia and Democratic Republic of the Congo rank globally for afolu — indirect emissions?
Australia ranks 9th and Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 12th of 192 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as AFOLU — Indirect emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Democratic Republic of the Congo: AFOLU — Indirect emissions. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/afolu-indirect-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/australia/democratic-republic-of-the-congo/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/afolu-indirect-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/australia/democratic-republic-of-the-congo/">Australia vs Democratic Republic of the Congo: AFOLU — Indirect emissions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
AFOLU — Indirect emissions (N2O)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
244 places, 8,019 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf