Belgium-Luxembourg vs Mozambique: AFOLU — Indirect emissions
AFOLU — Indirect emissions over time
- Belgium-Luxembourg
- Mozambique
How they compare
Mozambique currently reports 2.54 kt against 2.22 kt in Belgium-Luxembourg, a difference of 0.32 kt.
That makes Mozambique's figure about 1.1 times Belgium-Luxembourg's.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Belgium-Luxembourg has been ahead every year.
Belgium-Luxembourg ranks 85th and Mozambique ranks 82nd of 192 countries.
Belgium-Luxembourg has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher afolu — indirect emissions, Belgium-Luxembourg or Mozambique?
- Mozambique, at 2.54 kt against 2.22 kt in Belgium-Luxembourg as of 2023.
- What is the difference in afolu — indirect emissions between Belgium-Luxembourg and Mozambique?
- 0.32 kt, with Mozambique ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium-Luxembourg and Mozambique?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 1999.
- How do Belgium-Luxembourg and Mozambique rank globally for afolu — indirect emissions?
- Belgium-Luxembourg ranks 85th and Mozambique ranks 82nd of 192 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as AFOLU — Indirect emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf