Cuba vs Namibia: AFOLU — Indirect emissions
AFOLU — Indirect emissions over time
- Cuba
- Namibia
How they compare
Cuba currently reports 2.95 kt against 2.77 kt in Namibia, a difference of 0.18 kt.
That makes Cuba's figure about 1.1 times Namibia's.
Across all 34 years both countries report, Cuba has been ahead every year.
Cuba ranks 77th and Namibia ranks 78th of 189 countries.
Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 3.55 kt | 1.98 kt | 1.57 kt | Cuba |
| 2000s | 3.27 kt | 2.25 kt | 1.02 kt | Cuba |
| 2010s | 3.38 kt | 2.31 kt | 1.07 kt | Cuba |
| 2020s | 3.04 kt | 2.32 kt | 0.7152 kt | Cuba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher afolu — indirect emissions, Cuba or Namibia?
- Cuba, at 2.95 kt against 2.77 kt in Namibia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in afolu — indirect emissions between Cuba and Namibia?
- 0.18 kt, with Cuba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Namibia?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Cuba and Namibia rank globally for afolu — indirect emissions?
- Cuba ranks 77th and Namibia ranks 78th of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as AFOLU — Indirect emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf