Czechia vs Panama: AFOLU — Indirect emissions
AFOLU — Indirect emissions over time
- Czechia
- Panama
How they compare
Panama currently reports 1.04 kt against 1 kt in Czechia, a difference of 0.04 kt.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Czechia ahead.
Czechia ranks 108th and Panama ranks 107th of 192 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Czechia averaged higher in 2 and Panama in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechia | Panama | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.4 kt | 0.928 kt | 0.4699 kt | Czechia |
| 2000s | 1.13 kt | 0.9994 kt | 0.1273 kt | Czechia |
| 2010s | 1.03 kt | 1.06 kt | 0.029 kt | Panama |
| 2020s | 1.01 kt | 1.03 kt | 0.0201 kt | Panama |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher afolu — indirect emissions, Czechia or Panama?
- Panama, at 1.04 kt against 1 kt in Czechia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in afolu — indirect emissions between Czechia and Panama?
- 0.04 kt, with Panama ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Panama?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Czechia and Panama rank globally for afolu — indirect emissions?
- Czechia ranks 108th and Panama ranks 107th of 192 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as AFOLU — Indirect emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf