Malawi vs Zimbabwe: AFOLU — Indirect emissions
AFOLU — Indirect emissions over time
- Malawi
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 4.98 kt against 4.87 kt in Malawi, a difference of 0.11 kt.
Across all 34 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.
Malawi ranks 58th and Zimbabwe ranks 56th of 192 countries.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malawi | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.8203 kt | 3.81 kt | 2.99 kt | Zimbabwe |
| 2000s | 1.18 kt | 4.13 kt | 2.95 kt | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 2.68 kt | 4.43 kt | 1.75 kt | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 4.54 kt | 4.73 kt | 0.1904 kt | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher afolu — indirect emissions, Malawi or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 4.98 kt against 4.87 kt in Malawi as of 2023.
- What is the difference in afolu — indirect emissions between Malawi and Zimbabwe?
- 0.11 kt, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Zimbabwe?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Malawi and Zimbabwe rank globally for afolu — indirect emissions?
- Malawi ranks 58th and Zimbabwe ranks 56th of 192 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as AFOLU — Indirect emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf