Mongolia vs United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland: AFOLU — Indirect emissions

Mongolia
13.79 kt
in 2023
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
12.36 kt
in 2023
Mongolia rank
32nd
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland rank
35th

AFOLU — Indirect emissions over time

  • Mongolia
  • United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
57.51012.515199020062023

How they compare

Mongolia currently reports 13.79 kt against 12.36 kt in United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, a difference of 1.43 kt.

That makes Mongolia's figure about 1.1 times United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ahead.

Mongolia ranks 32nd and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ranks 35th of 225 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Mongolia averaged higher in 1 and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mongolia United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland Difference Ahead
1990s 6.14 kt 15.55 kt 9.41 kt United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
2000s 7.02 kt 13.3 kt 6.28 kt United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
2010s 10.85 kt 12.64 kt 1.79 kt United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
2020s 14.14 kt 12.56 kt 1.59 kt Mongolia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher afolu — indirect emissions, Mongolia or United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland?
Mongolia, at 13.79 kt against 12.36 kt in United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland as of 2023.
What is the difference in afolu — indirect emissions between Mongolia and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland?
1.43 kt, with Mongolia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Mongolia and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland rank globally for afolu — indirect emissions?
Mongolia ranks 32nd and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ranks 35th of 225 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as AFOLU — Indirect emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mongolia vs United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland: AFOLU — Indirect emissions. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/afolu-indirect-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/mongolia/united-kingdom-of-great-britain-and-northern-ireland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/afolu-indirect-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/mongolia/united-kingdom-of-great-britain-and-northern-ireland/">Mongolia vs United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland: AFOLU — Indirect emissions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
AFOLU — Indirect emissions (N2O)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
258 places, 8,470 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf