Austria vs Slovenia: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 25 - GHG Emissions by

Austria
10,450 Kilotonnes of CO2-equivalent
in 2020
Slovenia
1,796 Kilotonnes of CO2-equivalent
in 2020
Austria rank
43rd
Slovenia rank
40th

Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 25 - GHG Emissions by over time

  • Austria
  • Slovenia
2.5k5.0k7.5k10.0k12.5k200020102020

How they compare

Austria currently reports 10,450 Kilotonnes of CO2-equivalent against 1,796 Kilotonnes of CO2-equivalent in Slovenia, a difference of 8,654 Kilotonnes of CO2-equivalent.

That makes Austria's figure about 5.8 times Slovenia's.

Across all 21 years both countries report, Austria has been ahead every year.

Austria ranks 43rd and Slovenia ranks 40th of 166 countries.

Austria has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Austria Slovenia Difference Ahead
2000s 11,055 Kilotonnes of CO2-equivalent 2,208 Kilotonnes of CO2-equivalent 8,848 Kilotonnes of CO2-equivalent Austria
2010s 10,864 Kilotonnes of CO2-equivalent 1,718 Kilotonnes of CO2-equivalent 9,145 Kilotonnes of CO2-equivalent Austria
2020s 10,450 Kilotonnes of CO2-equivalent 1,796 Kilotonnes of CO2-equivalent 8,654 Kilotonnes of CO2-equivalent Austria

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 25 - ghg emissions by, Austria or Slovenia?
Austria, at 10,450 Kilotonnes of CO2-equivalent against 1,796 Kilotonnes of CO2-equivalent in Slovenia as of 2020.
What is the difference in africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 25 - ghg emissions by between Austria and Slovenia?
8,654 Kilotonnes of CO2-equivalent, with Austria ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Slovenia?
21 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
How do Austria and Slovenia rank globally for africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 25 - ghg emissions by?
Austria ranks 43rd and Slovenia ranks 40th of 166 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 25 - GHG Emissions by sector — GHG emissions from manufacturing industries and construction. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Austria vs Slovenia: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 25 - GHG Emissions by. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 29 August 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-25-ghg-emissions-by-sector-ghg-emissions-from-2/austria/slovenia-2/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-25-ghg-emissions-by-sector-ghg-emissions-from-2/austria/slovenia-2/">Austria vs Slovenia: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 25 - GHG Emissions by</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 25 - GHG Emissions by sector — GHG emissions from manufacturing industries and construction
Unit
Kilotonnes of CO2-equivalent
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
241 places, 5,044 data points, 2000–2020
Last refreshed

The Statistical Annex to the annual Africa's Development Dynamics (AFDD) report is a collection of development indicators that were gathered and analysed while conducting the research that went into the report. These data are also available online for free viewing or download at https://oe.cd/AFDD-2024, a bilingual website which links to the electronic version of the Africa's Development Dynamics book in both English and French. Table 25 shows statistics on GHG emissions from different sources.