Cuba vs New Zealand: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 25 - GHG Emissions by

Cuba
5,234 Kilotonnes of CO2-equivalent
in 2020
New Zealand
6,527 Kilotonnes of CO2-equivalent
in 2020
Cuba rank
55th
New Zealand rank
52nd

Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 25 - GHG Emissions by over time

  • Cuba
  • New Zealand
02.5k5.0k7.5k10.0k12.5k200020102020

How they compare

New Zealand currently reports 6,527 Kilotonnes of CO2-equivalent against 5,234 Kilotonnes of CO2-equivalent in Cuba, a difference of 1,293 Kilotonnes of CO2-equivalent.

That makes New Zealand's figure about 1.2 times Cuba's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Cuba ahead.

Cuba ranks 55th and New Zealand ranks 52nd of 166 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 1 and New Zealand in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cuba New Zealand Difference Ahead
2000s 7,854 Kilotonnes of CO2-equivalent 5,804 Kilotonnes of CO2-equivalent 2,050 Kilotonnes of CO2-equivalent Cuba
2010s 6,259 Kilotonnes of CO2-equivalent 6,265 Kilotonnes of CO2-equivalent 5.69 Kilotonnes of CO2-equivalent New Zealand
2020s 5,234 Kilotonnes of CO2-equivalent 6,527 Kilotonnes of CO2-equivalent 1,293 Kilotonnes of CO2-equivalent New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 25 - ghg emissions by, Cuba or New Zealand?
New Zealand, at 6,527 Kilotonnes of CO2-equivalent against 5,234 Kilotonnes of CO2-equivalent in Cuba as of 2020.
What is the difference in africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 25 - ghg emissions by between Cuba and New Zealand?
1,293 Kilotonnes of CO2-equivalent, with New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and New Zealand?
21 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
How do Cuba and New Zealand rank globally for africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 25 - ghg emissions by?
Cuba ranks 55th and New Zealand ranks 52nd of 166 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 25 - GHG Emissions by sector — GHG emissions from manufacturing industries and construction. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cuba vs New Zealand: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 25 - GHG Emissions by. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-25-ghg-emissions-by-sector-ghg-emissions-from-2/cuba/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-25-ghg-emissions-by-sector-ghg-emissions-from-2/cuba/new-zealand/">Cuba vs New Zealand: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 25 - GHG Emissions by</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 25 - GHG Emissions by sector — GHG emissions from manufacturing industries and construction
Unit
Kilotonnes of CO2-equivalent
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
241 places, 5,044 data points, 2000–2020
Last refreshed

The Statistical Annex to the annual Africa's Development Dynamics (AFDD) report is a collection of development indicators that were gathered and analysed while conducting the research that went into the report. These data are also available online for free viewing or download at https://oe.cd/AFDD-2024, a bilingual website which links to the electronic version of the Africa's Development Dynamics book in both English and French. Table 25 shows statistics on GHG emissions from different sources.