El Salvador vs Zambia: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 25 - GHG Emissions by

El Salvador
1,366 Kilotonnes of CO2-equivalent
in 2020
Zambia
1,412 Kilotonnes of CO2-equivalent
in 2020
El Salvador rank
86th
Zambia rank
85th

Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 25 - GHG Emissions by over time

  • El Salvador
  • Zambia
05001.0k1.5k200020102020

How they compare

Zambia currently reports 1,412 Kilotonnes of CO2-equivalent against 1,366 Kilotonnes of CO2-equivalent in El Salvador, a difference of 46 Kilotonnes of CO2-equivalent.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2000 it was El Salvador ahead.

El Salvador ranks 86th and Zambia ranks 85th of 166 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, El Salvador averaged higher in 1 and Zambia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade El Salvador Zambia Difference Ahead
2000s 1,225 Kilotonnes of CO2-equivalent 792.68 Kilotonnes of CO2-equivalent 432.78 Kilotonnes of CO2-equivalent El Salvador
2010s 1,162 Kilotonnes of CO2-equivalent 1,440 Kilotonnes of CO2-equivalent 277.8 Kilotonnes of CO2-equivalent Zambia
2020s 1,366 Kilotonnes of CO2-equivalent 1,412 Kilotonnes of CO2-equivalent 46.5 Kilotonnes of CO2-equivalent Zambia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 25 - ghg emissions by, El Salvador or Zambia?
Zambia, at 1,412 Kilotonnes of CO2-equivalent against 1,366 Kilotonnes of CO2-equivalent in El Salvador as of 2020.
What is the difference in africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 25 - ghg emissions by between El Salvador and Zambia?
46 Kilotonnes of CO2-equivalent, with Zambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Zambia?
21 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
How do El Salvador and Zambia rank globally for africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 25 - ghg emissions by?
El Salvador ranks 86th and Zambia ranks 85th of 166 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 25 - GHG Emissions by sector — GHG emissions from manufacturing industries and construction. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

El Salvador vs Zambia: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 25 - GHG Emissions by. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-25-ghg-emissions-by-sector-ghg-emissions-from-2/el-salvador/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-25-ghg-emissions-by-sector-ghg-emissions-from-2/el-salvador/zambia/">El Salvador vs Zambia: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 25 - GHG Emissions by</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 25 - GHG Emissions by sector — GHG emissions from manufacturing industries and construction
Unit
Kilotonnes of CO2-equivalent
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
241 places, 5,044 data points, 2000–2020
Last refreshed

The Statistical Annex to the annual Africa's Development Dynamics (AFDD) report is a collection of development indicators that were gathered and analysed while conducting the research that went into the report. These data are also available online for free viewing or download at https://oe.cd/AFDD-2024, a bilingual website which links to the electronic version of the Africa's Development Dynamics book in both English and French. Table 25 shows statistics on GHG emissions from different sources.