New Zealand vs Norway: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 25 - GHG Emissions by

New Zealand
6,527 Kilotonnes of CO2-equivalent
in 2020
Norway
6,498 Kilotonnes of CO2-equivalent
in 2020
New Zealand rank
52nd
Norway rank
53rd

Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 25 - GHG Emissions by over time

  • New Zealand
  • Norway
02.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k200020102020

How they compare

New Zealand currently reports 6,527 Kilotonnes of CO2-equivalent against 6,498 Kilotonnes of CO2-equivalent in Norway, a difference of 29 Kilotonnes of CO2-equivalent.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Norway ahead.

New Zealand ranks 52nd and Norway ranks 53rd of 166 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, New Zealand averaged higher in 1 and Norway in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade New Zealand Norway Difference Ahead
2000s 5,804 Kilotonnes of CO2-equivalent 6,169 Kilotonnes of CO2-equivalent 365.14 Kilotonnes of CO2-equivalent Norway
2010s 6,265 Kilotonnes of CO2-equivalent 6,469 Kilotonnes of CO2-equivalent 204.85 Kilotonnes of CO2-equivalent Norway
2020s 6,527 Kilotonnes of CO2-equivalent 6,498 Kilotonnes of CO2-equivalent 28.3 Kilotonnes of CO2-equivalent New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 25 - ghg emissions by, New Zealand or Norway?
New Zealand, at 6,527 Kilotonnes of CO2-equivalent against 6,498 Kilotonnes of CO2-equivalent in Norway as of 2020.
What is the difference in africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 25 - ghg emissions by between New Zealand and Norway?
29 Kilotonnes of CO2-equivalent, with New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Norway?
21 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
How do New Zealand and Norway rank globally for africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 25 - ghg emissions by?
New Zealand ranks 52nd and Norway ranks 53rd of 166 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 25 - GHG Emissions by sector — GHG emissions from manufacturing industries and construction. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

New Zealand vs Norway: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 25 - GHG Emissions by. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-25-ghg-emissions-by-sector-ghg-emissions-from-2/new-zealand/norway/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-25-ghg-emissions-by-sector-ghg-emissions-from-2/new-zealand/norway/">New Zealand vs Norway: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 25 - GHG Emissions by</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 25 - GHG Emissions by sector — GHG emissions from manufacturing industries and construction
Unit
Kilotonnes of CO2-equivalent
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
241 places, 5,044 data points, 2000–2020
Last refreshed

The Statistical Annex to the annual Africa's Development Dynamics (AFDD) report is a collection of development indicators that were gathered and analysed while conducting the research that went into the report. These data are also available online for free viewing or download at https://oe.cd/AFDD-2024, a bilingual website which links to the electronic version of the Africa's Development Dynamics book in both English and French. Table 25 shows statistics on GHG emissions from different sources.