Australia vs Eswatini: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 25 - GHG Emissions by

Australia
5,003 Kilotonnes of CO2-equivalent
in 2020
Eswatini
47.1 Kilotonnes of CO2-equivalent
in 2020
Australia rank
21st
Eswatini rank
23rd

Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 25 - GHG Emissions by over time

  • Australia
  • Eswatini
02.0k4.0k6.0k200020102020

How they compare

Australia currently reports 5,003 Kilotonnes of CO2-equivalent against 47.1 Kilotonnes of CO2-equivalent in Eswatini, a difference of 4,956 Kilotonnes of CO2-equivalent.

That makes Australia's figure about 106.2 times Eswatini's.

Across all 21 years both countries report, Australia has been ahead every year.

Australia ranks 21st and Eswatini ranks 23rd of 166 countries.

Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Eswatini Difference Ahead
2000s 4,022 Kilotonnes of CO2-equivalent 5.7 Kilotonnes of CO2-equivalent 4,016 Kilotonnes of CO2-equivalent Australia
2010s 5,007 Kilotonnes of CO2-equivalent 64.12 Kilotonnes of CO2-equivalent 4,943 Kilotonnes of CO2-equivalent Australia
2020s 5,003 Kilotonnes of CO2-equivalent 47.1 Kilotonnes of CO2-equivalent 4,956 Kilotonnes of CO2-equivalent Australia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 25 - ghg emissions by, Australia or Eswatini?
Australia, at 5,003 Kilotonnes of CO2-equivalent against 47.1 Kilotonnes of CO2-equivalent in Eswatini as of 2020.
What is the difference in africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 25 - ghg emissions by between Australia and Eswatini?
4,956 Kilotonnes of CO2-equivalent, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Eswatini?
21 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
How do Australia and Eswatini rank globally for africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 25 - ghg emissions by?
Australia ranks 21st and Eswatini ranks 23rd of 166 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 25 - GHG Emissions by sector — GHG emissions from commercial and public services. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Eswatini: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 25 - GHG Emissions by. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 27 August 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-25-ghg-emissions-by-sector-ghg-emissions-from/australia/eswatini-2/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-25-ghg-emissions-by-sector-ghg-emissions-from/australia/eswatini-2/">Australia vs Eswatini: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 25 - GHG Emissions by</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 25 - GHG Emissions by sector — GHG emissions from commercial and public services
Unit
Kilotonnes of CO2-equivalent
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
241 places, 5,044 data points, 2000–2020
Last refreshed

The Statistical Annex to the annual Africa's Development Dynamics (AFDD) report is a collection of development indicators that were gathered and analysed while conducting the research that went into the report. These data are also available online for free viewing or download at https://oe.cd/AFDD-2024, a bilingual website which links to the electronic version of the Africa's Development Dynamics book in both English and French. Table 25 shows statistics on GHG emissions from different sources.