Mongolia vs Zimbabwe: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 25 - GHG Emissions by

Mongolia
1.7 Kilotonnes of CO2-equivalent
in 2020
Zimbabwe
0.9 Kilotonnes of CO2-equivalent
in 2020
Mongolia rank
130th
Zimbabwe rank
133rd

Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 25 - GHG Emissions by over time

  • Mongolia
  • Zimbabwe
0200400600800200020102020

How they compare

Mongolia currently reports 1.7 Kilotonnes of CO2-equivalent against 0.9 Kilotonnes of CO2-equivalent in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.8 Kilotonnes of CO2-equivalent.

That makes Mongolia's figure about 1.9 times Zimbabwe's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 21 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Mongolia ranks 130th and Zimbabwe ranks 133rd of 166 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Mongolia averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mongolia Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
2000s 76.17 Kilotonnes of CO2-equivalent 507.57 Kilotonnes of CO2-equivalent 431.4 Kilotonnes of CO2-equivalent Zimbabwe
2010s 2.12 Kilotonnes of CO2-equivalent 76.86 Kilotonnes of CO2-equivalent 74.74 Kilotonnes of CO2-equivalent Zimbabwe
2020s 1.7 Kilotonnes of CO2-equivalent 0.9 Kilotonnes of CO2-equivalent 0.8 Kilotonnes of CO2-equivalent Mongolia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 25 - ghg emissions by, Mongolia or Zimbabwe?
Mongolia, at 1.7 Kilotonnes of CO2-equivalent against 0.9 Kilotonnes of CO2-equivalent in Zimbabwe as of 2020.
What is the difference in africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 25 - ghg emissions by between Mongolia and Zimbabwe?
0.8 Kilotonnes of CO2-equivalent, with Mongolia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Zimbabwe?
21 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
How do Mongolia and Zimbabwe rank globally for africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 25 - ghg emissions by?
Mongolia ranks 130th and Zimbabwe ranks 133rd of 166 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 25 - GHG Emissions by sector — GHG emissions from commercial and public services. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mongolia vs Zimbabwe: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 25 - GHG Emissions by. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 23 August 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-25-ghg-emissions-by-sector-ghg-emissions-from/mongolia/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-25-ghg-emissions-by-sector-ghg-emissions-from/mongolia/zimbabwe/">Mongolia vs Zimbabwe: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 25 - GHG Emissions by</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 25 - GHG Emissions by sector — GHG emissions from commercial and public services
Unit
Kilotonnes of CO2-equivalent
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
241 places, 5,044 data points, 2000–2020
Last refreshed

The Statistical Annex to the annual Africa's Development Dynamics (AFDD) report is a collection of development indicators that were gathered and analysed while conducting the research that went into the report. These data are also available online for free viewing or download at https://oe.cd/AFDD-2024, a bilingual website which links to the electronic version of the Africa's Development Dynamics book in both English and French. Table 25 shows statistics on GHG emissions from different sources.