Ecuador vs Yugoslav SFR: Agricultural Soils — Direct emissions (N2O), annual growth rate

Ecuador
-14.26 % change on previous year
in 2023
Yugoslav SFR
-10.81 % change on previous year
in 1991
Ecuador rank
224th
Yugoslav SFR rank
221st

Agricultural Soils — Direct emissions (N2O), annual growth rate over time

  • Ecuador
  • Yugoslav SFR
-100102030196219922023

How they compare

Yugoslav SFR currently reports -10.81 % change on previous year against -14.26 % change on previous year in Ecuador, a difference of 3.45 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 16 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Ecuador ahead.

Ecuador ranks 224th and Yugoslav SFR ranks 221st of 233 countries.

Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Yugoslav SFR Difference Ahead
1960s 5.4 % change on previous year 2.13 % change on previous year 3.27 % change on previous year Ecuador
1970s 2.66 % change on previous year 1.63 % change on previous year 1.03 % change on previous year Ecuador
1980s 2.94 % change on previous year -0.2505 % change on previous year 3.19 % change on previous year Ecuador
1990s 3.18 % change on previous year -6.31 % change on previous year 9.49 % change on previous year Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agricultural soils — direct emissions (n2o), annual growth rate, Ecuador or Yugoslav SFR?
Yugoslav SFR, at -10.81 % change on previous year against -14.26 % change on previous year in Ecuador as of 1991.
What is the difference in agricultural soils — direct emissions (n2o), annual growth rate between Ecuador and Yugoslav SFR?
3.45 % change on previous year, with Yugoslav SFR ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Yugoslav SFR?
30 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 1991.
How do Ecuador and Yugoslav SFR rank globally for agricultural soils — direct emissions (n2o), annual growth rate?
Ecuador ranks 224th and Yugoslav SFR ranks 221st of 233 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agricultural Soils — Direct emissions (N2O), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Yugoslav SFR: Agricultural Soils — Direct emissions (N2O), annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/agricultural-soils-direct-emissions-n2o-annual-growth-rate/ecuador/yugoslav-sfr/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/agricultural-soils-direct-emissions-n2o-annual-growth-rate/ecuador/yugoslav-sfr/">Ecuador vs Yugoslav SFR: Agricultural Soils — Direct emissions (N2O), annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agricultural Soils — Direct emissions (N2O), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
266 places, 14,873 data points, 1962–2023
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Agricultural Soils — Direct emissions (N2O). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.