Barbados vs China, Hong Kong SAR: Agricultural Soils — Direct emissions

Barbados
0.0751 kt
in 2023
China, Hong Kong SAR
0.0562 kt
in 2023
Barbados rank
166th
China, Hong Kong SAR rank
167th

Agricultural Soils — Direct emissions over time

  • Barbados
  • China, Hong Kong SAR
0.020.040.060.080.10.12196119922023

How they compare

Barbados currently reports 0.0751 kt against 0.0562 kt in China, Hong Kong SAR, a difference of 0.0189 kt.

That makes Barbados's figure about 1.3 times China, Hong Kong SAR's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Barbados ahead.

Barbados ranks 166th and China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 167th of 201 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Barbados averaged higher in 5 and China, Hong Kong SAR in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Barbados China, Hong Kong SAR Difference Ahead
1960s 0.096 kt 0.0625 kt 0.0335 kt Barbados
1970s 0.0826 kt 0.0888 kt 0.0062 kt China, Hong Kong SAR
1980s 0.0936 kt 0.0942 kt 0.0007 kt China, Hong Kong SAR
1990s 0.1034 kt 0.0491 kt 0.0543 kt Barbados
2000s 0.0805 kt 0.0394 kt 0.0411 kt Barbados
2010s 0.074 kt 0.0509 kt 0.0231 kt Barbados
2020s 0.0745 kt 0.0563 kt 0.0181 kt Barbados

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agricultural soils — direct emissions, Barbados or China, Hong Kong SAR?
Barbados, at 0.0751 kt against 0.0562 kt in China, Hong Kong SAR as of 2023.
What is the difference in agricultural soils — direct emissions between Barbados and China, Hong Kong SAR?
0.0189 kt, with Barbados ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and China, Hong Kong SAR?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Barbados and China, Hong Kong SAR rank globally for agricultural soils — direct emissions?
Barbados ranks 166th and China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 167th of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Agricultural Soils — Direct emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Barbados vs China, Hong Kong SAR: Agricultural Soils — Direct emissions. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/agricultural-soils-direct-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/barbados/china-hong-kong-sar/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/agricultural-soils-direct-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/barbados/china-hong-kong-sar/">Barbados vs China, Hong Kong SAR: Agricultural Soils — Direct emissions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agricultural Soils — Direct emissions (N2O)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
253 places, 14,507 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf