China, mainland vs Latin America and the Caribbean: Agricultural Soils — Direct emissions

China, mainland
746.52 kt
in 2023
Latin America and the Caribbean
930.05 kt
in 2023
China, mainland rank
3rd
Latin America and the Caribbean rank
6th

Agricultural Soils — Direct emissions over time

  • China, mainland
  • Latin America and the Caribbean
2004006008001.0k196119922023

How they compare

Latin America and the Caribbean currently reports 930.05 kt against 746.52 kt in China, mainland, a difference of 183.53 kt.

That makes Latin America and the Caribbean's figure about 1.2 times China, mainland's.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Latin America and the Caribbean ahead.

China, mainland ranks 3rd and Latin America and the Caribbean ranks 6th of 201 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, China, mainland averaged higher in 2 and Latin America and the Caribbean in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, mainland Latin America and the Caribbean Difference Ahead
1960s 168.28 kt 337.45 kt 169.17 kt Latin America and the Caribbean
1970s 265.69 kt 439.24 kt 173.55 kt Latin America and the Caribbean
1980s 445.02 kt 540.5 kt 95.47 kt Latin America and the Caribbean
1990s 630.18 kt 605.2 kt 24.98 kt China, mainland
2000s 729.79 kt 716.19 kt 13.6 kt China, mainland
2010s 797.25 kt 818.36 kt 21.11 kt Latin America and the Caribbean
2020s 745.68 kt 919.88 kt 174.19 kt Latin America and the Caribbean

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agricultural soils — direct emissions, China, mainland or Latin America and the Caribbean?
Latin America and the Caribbean, at 930.05 kt against 746.52 kt in China, mainland as of 2023.
What is the difference in agricultural soils — direct emissions between China, mainland and Latin America and the Caribbean?
183.53 kt, with Latin America and the Caribbean ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, mainland and Latin America and the Caribbean?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do China, mainland and Latin America and the Caribbean rank globally for agricultural soils — direct emissions?
China, mainland ranks 3rd and Latin America and the Caribbean ranks 6th of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Agricultural Soils — Direct emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, mainland vs Latin America and the Caribbean: Agricultural Soils — Direct emissions. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/agricultural-soils-direct-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/china-mainland/latin-america-and-the-caribbean/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/agricultural-soils-direct-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/china-mainland/latin-america-and-the-caribbean/">China, mainland vs Latin America and the Caribbean: Agricultural Soils — Direct emissions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agricultural Soils — Direct emissions (N2O)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
253 places, 14,507 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf