Latvia vs Niger: Agricultural Soils — Direct emissions (N2O), per capita
Latvia
0 kt per person
in 2023
Niger
0 kt per person
in 2023
Latvia rank
24th
Niger rank
22nd
Agricultural Soils — Direct emissions (N2O), per capita over time
- Latvia
- Niger
How they compare
Niger currently reports 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Latvia, a difference of 0 kt per person.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Latvia ahead.
Latvia ranks 24th and Niger ranks 22nd of 187 countries.
Niger has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Niger | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Niger |
| 2000s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Niger |
| 2010s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Niger |
| 2020s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Niger |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher agricultural soils — direct emissions (n2o), per capita, Latvia or Niger?
- Niger, at 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Latvia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in agricultural soils — direct emissions (n2o), per capita between Latvia and Niger?
- 0 kt per person, with Niger ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Niger?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Latvia and Niger rank globally for agricultural soils — direct emissions (n2o), per capita?
- Latvia ranks 24th and Niger ranks 22nd of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Agricultural Soils — Direct emissions (N2O), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Agricultural Soils — Direct emissions (N2O) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.