Cuba vs Tuvalu: Agricultural Soils — Direct emissions (N2O), per square kilometre

Cuba
0.0001 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Tuvalu
0.0001 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Cuba rank
66th
Tuvalu rank
65th

Agricultural Soils — Direct emissions (N2O), per square kilometre over time

  • Cuba
  • Tuvalu
00000196119922023

How they compare

Tuvalu currently reports 0.0001 kt per square kilometre against 0.0001 kt per square kilometre in Cuba, a difference of 0 kt per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Cuba ahead.

Cuba ranks 66th and Tuvalu ranks 65th of 187 countries.

Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cuba Tuvalu Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0001 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0.0001 kt per square kilometre Cuba
1970s 0.0001 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0.0001 kt per square kilometre Cuba
1980s 0.0001 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0.0001 kt per square kilometre Cuba
1990s 0.0001 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Cuba
2000s 0.0001 kt per square kilometre 0.0001 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Cuba
2010s 0.0001 kt per square kilometre 0.0001 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Cuba
2020s 0.0001 kt per square kilometre 0.0001 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Cuba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agricultural soils — direct emissions (n2o), per square kilometre, Cuba or Tuvalu?
Tuvalu, at 0.0001 kt per square kilometre against 0.0001 kt per square kilometre in Cuba as of 2023.
What is the difference in agricultural soils — direct emissions (n2o), per square kilometre between Cuba and Tuvalu?
0 kt per square kilometre, with Tuvalu ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Tuvalu?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Cuba and Tuvalu rank globally for agricultural soils — direct emissions (n2o), per square kilometre?
Cuba ranks 66th and Tuvalu ranks 65th of 187 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agricultural Soils — Direct emissions (N2O), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cuba vs Tuvalu: Agricultural Soils — Direct emissions (N2O), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/agricultural-soils-direct-emissions-n2o-per-square-kilometre/cuba/tuvalu/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/agricultural-soils-direct-emissions-n2o-per-square-kilometre/cuba/tuvalu/">Cuba vs Tuvalu: Agricultural Soils — Direct emissions (N2O), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agricultural Soils — Direct emissions (N2O), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
188 places, 10,684 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agricultural Soils — Direct emissions (N2O) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.