Sao Tome and Principe vs Seychelles: Agricultural Soils — Direct emissions (N2O), per square kilometre

Sao Tome and Principe
0 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Seychelles
0 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Sao Tome and Principe rank
137th
Seychelles rank
140th

Agricultural Soils — Direct emissions (N2O), per square kilometre over time

  • Sao Tome and Principe
  • Seychelles
00000196119922023

How they compare

Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in Seychelles, a difference of 0 kt per square kilometre.

That makes Sao Tome and Principe's figure about 1.2 times Seychelles's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Sao Tome and Principe ahead.

Sao Tome and Principe ranks 137th and Seychelles ranks 140th of 187 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Sao Tome and Principe averaged higher in 2 and Seychelles in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Sao Tome and Principe Seychelles Difference Ahead
1960s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Seychelles
1970s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Seychelles
1980s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Seychelles
1990s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Seychelles
2000s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Seychelles
2010s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe
2020s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agricultural soils — direct emissions (n2o), per square kilometre, Sao Tome and Principe or Seychelles?
Sao Tome and Principe, at 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in Seychelles as of 2023.
What is the difference in agricultural soils — direct emissions (n2o), per square kilometre between Sao Tome and Principe and Seychelles?
0 kt per square kilometre, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sao Tome and Principe and Seychelles?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Sao Tome and Principe and Seychelles rank globally for agricultural soils — direct emissions (n2o), per square kilometre?
Sao Tome and Principe ranks 137th and Seychelles ranks 140th of 187 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agricultural Soils — Direct emissions (N2O), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sao Tome and Principe vs Seychelles: Agricultural Soils — Direct emissions (N2O), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/agricultural-soils-direct-emissions-n2o-per-square-kilometre/sao-tome-and-principe/seychelles/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/agricultural-soils-direct-emissions-n2o-per-square-kilometre/sao-tome-and-principe/seychelles/">Sao Tome and Principe vs Seychelles: Agricultural Soils — Direct emissions (N2O), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agricultural Soils — Direct emissions (N2O), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
188 places, 10,684 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agricultural Soils — Direct emissions (N2O) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.