East Timor vs Zimbabwe: Agricultural Soils — Direct emissions (N2O), per square kilometre

East Timor
0 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
0 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
East Timor rank
119th
Zimbabwe rank
121st

Agricultural Soils — Direct emissions (N2O), per square kilometre over time

  • East Timor
  • Zimbabwe
000000196119922023

How they compare

East Timor currently reports 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0 kt per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was East Timor ahead.

East Timor ranks 119th and Zimbabwe ranks 121st of 187 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, East Timor averaged higher in 3 and Zimbabwe in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade East Timor Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre East Timor
1970s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1980s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1990s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2000s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2010s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre East Timor
2020s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre East Timor

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agricultural soils — direct emissions (n2o), per square kilometre, East Timor or Zimbabwe?
East Timor, at 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in agricultural soils — direct emissions (n2o), per square kilometre between East Timor and Zimbabwe?
0 kt per square kilometre, with East Timor ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for East Timor and Zimbabwe?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do East Timor and Zimbabwe rank globally for agricultural soils — direct emissions (n2o), per square kilometre?
East Timor ranks 119th and Zimbabwe ranks 121st of 187 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agricultural Soils — Direct emissions (N2O), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

East Timor vs Zimbabwe: Agricultural Soils — Direct emissions (N2O), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/agricultural-soils-direct-emissions-n2o-per-square-kilometre/timor-leste/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/agricultural-soils-direct-emissions-n2o-per-square-kilometre/timor-leste/zimbabwe/">East Timor vs Zimbabwe: Agricultural Soils — Direct emissions (N2O), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agricultural Soils — Direct emissions (N2O), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
188 places, 10,684 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agricultural Soils — Direct emissions (N2O) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.