Belgium vs Laos: Agricultural Soils — Emissions (CO2eq)
Agricultural Soils — Emissions (CO2eq) over time
- Belgium
- Laos
How they compare
Belgium currently reports 2,029 kt against 2,023 kt in Laos, a difference of 6 kt.
Across all 24 years both countries report, Belgium has been ahead every year.
Belgium ranks 116th and Laos ranks 117th of 260 countries.
Belgium has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Laos | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2,296 kt | 1,058 kt | 1,238 kt | Belgium |
| 2010s | 2,454 kt | 1,522 kt | 931.42 kt | Belgium |
| 2020s | 2,205 kt | 1,848 kt | 357.24 kt | Belgium |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher agricultural soils — emissions (co2eq), Belgium or Laos?
- Belgium, at 2,029 kt against 2,023 kt in Laos as of 2023.
- What is the difference in agricultural soils — emissions (co2eq) between Belgium and Laos?
- 6 kt, with Belgium ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Laos?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Belgium and Laos rank globally for agricultural soils — emissions (co2eq)?
- Belgium ranks 116th and Laos ranks 117th of 260 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Agricultural Soils — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf