Burundi vs Dominican Republic: Agricultural Soils — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre

Burundi
0.0531 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Dominican Republic
0.0544 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Burundi rank
14th
Dominican Republic rank
12th

Agricultural Soils — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre over time

  • Burundi
  • Dominican Republic
0.010.020.030.040.050.06196119922023

How they compare

Dominican Republic currently reports 0.0544 kt per square kilometre against 0.0531 kt per square kilometre in Burundi, a difference of 0.0013 kt per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Dominican Republic ahead.

Burundi ranks 14th and Dominican Republic ranks 12th of 201 countries.

Dominican Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Burundi Dominican Republic Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0118 kt per square kilometre 0.0149 kt per square kilometre 0.0031 kt per square kilometre Dominican Republic
1970s 0.017 kt per square kilometre 0.0227 kt per square kilometre 0.0057 kt per square kilometre Dominican Republic
1980s 0.0133 kt per square kilometre 0.0267 kt per square kilometre 0.0133 kt per square kilometre Dominican Republic
1990s 0.0188 kt per square kilometre 0.0328 kt per square kilometre 0.014 kt per square kilometre Dominican Republic
2000s 0.0201 kt per square kilometre 0.0385 kt per square kilometre 0.0184 kt per square kilometre Dominican Republic
2010s 0.0361 kt per square kilometre 0.0489 kt per square kilometre 0.0128 kt per square kilometre Dominican Republic
2020s 0.0506 kt per square kilometre 0.0556 kt per square kilometre 0.005 kt per square kilometre Dominican Republic

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agricultural soils — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square kilometre, Burundi or Dominican Republic?
Dominican Republic, at 0.0544 kt per square kilometre against 0.0531 kt per square kilometre in Burundi as of 2023.
What is the difference in agricultural soils — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square kilometre between Burundi and Dominican Republic?
0.0013 kt per square kilometre, with Dominican Republic ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Burundi and Dominican Republic?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Burundi and Dominican Republic rank globally for agricultural soils — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square kilometre?
Burundi ranks 14th and Dominican Republic ranks 12th of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agricultural Soils — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Burundi vs Dominican Republic: Agricultural Soils — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/agricultural-soils-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/burundi/dominican-republic/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/agricultural-soils-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/burundi/dominican-republic/">Burundi vs Dominican Republic: Agricultural Soils — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agricultural Soils — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
203 places, 11,244 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agricultural Soils — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.