Iceland vs Mauritania: Agricultural Soils — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre

Iceland
0.0026 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Mauritania
0.0027 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Iceland rank
166th
Mauritania rank
163rd

Agricultural Soils — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre over time

  • Iceland
  • Mauritania
0.0010.0020.0020.0030.003196119922023

How they compare

Mauritania currently reports 0.0027 kt per square kilometre against 0.0026 kt per square kilometre in Iceland, a difference of 0.0001 kt per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Mauritania ahead.

Iceland ranks 166th and Mauritania ranks 163rd of 201 countries.

Iceland has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Iceland Mauritania Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0016 kt per square kilometre 0.0016 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Iceland
1970s 0.0019 kt per square kilometre 0.0013 kt per square kilometre 0.0006 kt per square kilometre Iceland
1980s 0.0018 kt per square kilometre 0.0013 kt per square kilometre 0.0005 kt per square kilometre Iceland
1990s 0.003 kt per square kilometre 0.0016 kt per square kilometre 0.0014 kt per square kilometre Iceland
2000s 0.0029 kt per square kilometre 0.0021 kt per square kilometre 0.0008 kt per square kilometre Iceland
2010s 0.0028 kt per square kilometre 0.0025 kt per square kilometre 0.0004 kt per square kilometre Iceland
2020s 0.0028 kt per square kilometre 0.0027 kt per square kilometre 0.0001 kt per square kilometre Iceland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agricultural soils — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square kilometre, Iceland or Mauritania?
Mauritania, at 0.0027 kt per square kilometre against 0.0026 kt per square kilometre in Iceland as of 2023.
What is the difference in agricultural soils — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square kilometre between Iceland and Mauritania?
0.0001 kt per square kilometre, with Mauritania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Mauritania?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Iceland and Mauritania rank globally for agricultural soils — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square kilometre?
Iceland ranks 166th and Mauritania ranks 163rd of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agricultural Soils — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Iceland vs Mauritania: Agricultural Soils — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/agricultural-soils-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/iceland/mauritania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/agricultural-soils-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/iceland/mauritania/">Iceland vs Mauritania: Agricultural Soils — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agricultural Soils — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
203 places, 11,244 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agricultural Soils — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.