Antigua and Barbuda vs Cuba: Agricultural Soils — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5), annual growth

Antigua and Barbuda
-3.78 % change on previous year
in 2023
Cuba
-4.03 % change on previous year
in 2023
Antigua and Barbuda rank
197th
Cuba rank
198th

Agricultural Soils — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5), annual growth over time

  • Antigua and Barbuda
  • Cuba
-40-20020196219922023

How they compare

Antigua and Barbuda currently reports -3.78 % change on previous year against -4.03 % change on previous year in Cuba, a difference of 0.25 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 31 times across 62 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Cuba ahead.

Antigua and Barbuda ranks 197th and Cuba ranks 198th of 235 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Antigua and Barbuda averaged higher in 5 and Cuba in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Antigua and Barbuda Cuba Difference Ahead
1960s 3.22 % change on previous year 6.17 % change on previous year 2.95 % change on previous year Cuba
1970s 4.57 % change on previous year 0.3301 % change on previous year 4.24 % change on previous year Antigua and Barbuda
1980s 2.02 % change on previous year 1.3 % change on previous year 0.7179 % change on previous year Antigua and Barbuda
1990s 1.28 % change on previous year -4.91 % change on previous year 6.19 % change on previous year Antigua and Barbuda
2000s 0.6682 % change on previous year -1.33 % change on previous year 2 % change on previous year Antigua and Barbuda
2010s -4.44 % change on previous year 0.6515 % change on previous year 5.1 % change on previous year Cuba
2020s -2.16 % change on previous year -5.25 % change on previous year 3.09 % change on previous year Antigua and Barbuda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agricultural soils — emissions (co2eq) from n2o (ar5), annual growth, Antigua and Barbuda or Cuba?
Antigua and Barbuda, at -3.78 % change on previous year against -4.03 % change on previous year in Cuba as of 2023.
What is the difference in agricultural soils — emissions (co2eq) from n2o (ar5), annual growth between Antigua and Barbuda and Cuba?
0.25 % change on previous year, with Antigua and Barbuda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and Cuba?
62 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2023.
How do Antigua and Barbuda and Cuba rank globally for agricultural soils — emissions (co2eq) from n2o (ar5), annual growth?
Antigua and Barbuda ranks 197th and Cuba ranks 198th of 235 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agricultural Soils — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Antigua and Barbuda vs Cuba: Agricultural Soils — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5), annual growth. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/agricultural-soils-emissions-co2eq-from-n2o-ar5-annual-growth-rate/antigua-and-barbuda/cuba/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/agricultural-soils-emissions-co2eq-from-n2o-ar5-annual-growth-rate/antigua-and-barbuda/cuba/">Antigua and Barbuda vs Cuba: Agricultural Soils — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5), annual growth</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agricultural Soils — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
268 places, 14,947 data points, 1962–2023
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Agricultural Soils — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.