Democratic Republic of the Congo vs Republic of Moldova: Agricultural Soils — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) — UNFCCC

Democratic Republic of the Congo
283.55 kt
in 2003
Republic of Moldova
970.59 kt
in 2013
Democratic Republic of the Congo rank
4th
Republic of Moldova rank
2nd

Agricultural Soils — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) — UNFCCC over time

  • Democratic Republic of the Congo
  • Republic of Moldova
5001.0k1.5k2.0k2.5k199220022013

How they compare

Republic of Moldova currently reports 970.59 kt against 283.55 kt in Democratic Republic of the Congo, a difference of 687.04 kt.

That makes Republic of Moldova's figure about 3.4 times Democratic Republic of the Congo's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 1994 it was Republic of Moldova ahead.

Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 4th and Republic of Moldova ranks 2nd of 4 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Democratic Republic of the Congo averaged higher in 1 and Republic of Moldova in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Democratic Republic of the Congo Republic of Moldova Difference Ahead
1990s 1,472 kt 700.18 kt 771.49 kt Democratic Republic of the Congo
2000s 434.6 kt 743.01 kt 308.41 kt Republic of Moldova

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agricultural soils — emissions (co2eq) from n2o (ar5) — unfccc, Democratic Republic of the Congo or Republic of Moldova?
Republic of Moldova, at 970.59 kt against 283.55 kt in Democratic Republic of the Congo as of 2013.
What is the difference in agricultural soils — emissions (co2eq) from n2o (ar5) — unfccc between Democratic Republic of the Congo and Republic of Moldova?
687.04 kt, with Republic of Moldova ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic Republic of the Congo and Republic of Moldova?
6 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2003.
How do Democratic Republic of the Congo and Republic of Moldova rank globally for agricultural soils — emissions (co2eq) from n2o (ar5) — unfccc?
Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 4th and Republic of Moldova ranks 2nd of 4 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Agricultural Soils — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) — UNFCCC. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Democratic Republic of the Congo vs Republic of Moldova: Agricultural Soils — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) — UNFCCC. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/agricultural-soils-emissions-co2eq-from-n2o-ar5-unfccc/democratic-republic-of-the-congo/republic-of-moldova/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/agricultural-soils-emissions-co2eq-from-n2o-ar5-unfccc/democratic-republic-of-the-congo/republic-of-moldova/">Democratic Republic of the Congo vs Republic of Moldova: Agricultural Soils — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) — UNFCCC</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agricultural Soils — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) — UNFCCC
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
78 places, 1,793 data points, 1990–2020
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf