Canada vs South Sudan: Agricultural Soils — Emissions (N2O), per capita
Canada
0 kt per person
in 2023
South Sudan
0 kt per person
in 2023
Canada rank
14th
South Sudan rank
13th
Agricultural Soils — Emissions (N2O), per capita over time
- Canada
- South Sudan
How they compare
South Sudan currently reports 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Canada, a difference of 0 kt per person.
That makes South Sudan's figure about 1.1 times Canada's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Canada ahead.
Canada ranks 14th and South Sudan ranks 13th of 201 countries.
South Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Canada | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | South Sudan |
| 2020s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | South Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher agricultural soils — emissions (n2o), per capita, Canada or South Sudan?
- South Sudan, at 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Canada as of 2023.
- What is the difference in agricultural soils — emissions (n2o), per capita between Canada and South Sudan?
- 0 kt per person, with South Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and South Sudan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Canada and South Sudan rank globally for agricultural soils — emissions (n2o), per capita?
- Canada ranks 14th and South Sudan ranks 13th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Agricultural Soils — Emissions (N2O), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Agricultural Soils — Emissions (N2O) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.