Luxembourg vs Uganda: Agricultural Soils — Emissions (N2O), per capita
Luxembourg
0 kt per person
in 2023
Uganda
0 kt per person
in 2023
Luxembourg rank
78th
Uganda rank
77th
Agricultural Soils — Emissions (N2O), per capita over time
- Luxembourg
- Uganda
How they compare
Uganda currently reports 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Luxembourg, a difference of 0 kt per person.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Luxembourg ahead.
Luxembourg ranks 78th and Uganda ranks 77th of 201 countries.
Luxembourg has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Luxembourg | Uganda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Luxembourg |
| 2010s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Luxembourg |
| 2020s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Luxembourg |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher agricultural soils — emissions (n2o), per capita, Luxembourg or Uganda?
- Uganda, at 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Luxembourg as of 2023.
- What is the difference in agricultural soils — emissions (n2o), per capita between Luxembourg and Uganda?
- 0 kt per person, with Uganda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Luxembourg and Uganda?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Luxembourg and Uganda rank globally for agricultural soils — emissions (n2o), per capita?
- Luxembourg ranks 78th and Uganda ranks 77th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Agricultural Soils — Emissions (N2O), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Agricultural Soils — Emissions (N2O) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.