Malta vs Palau: Agricultural Soils — Emissions (N2O) — UNFCCC
Agricultural Soils — Emissions (N2O) — UNFCCC over time
- Malta
- Palau
How they compare
Malta currently reports 0.0813 kt against 0.031 kt in Palau, a difference of 0.0503 kt.
That makes Malta's figure about 2.6 times Palau's.
Across all 8 years both countries report, Malta has been ahead every year.
Malta ranks 68th and Palau ranks 71st of 73 countries.
Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malta | Palau | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.1115 kt | 0.02 kt | 0.0915 kt | Malta |
| 2000s | 0.1027 kt | 0.0315 kt | 0.0712 kt | Malta |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher agricultural soils — emissions (n2o) — unfccc, Malta or Palau?
- Malta, at 0.0813 kt against 0.031 kt in Palau as of 2020.
- What is the difference in agricultural soils — emissions (n2o) — unfccc between Malta and Palau?
- 0.0503 kt, with Malta ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Palau?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2005.
- How do Malta and Palau rank globally for agricultural soils — emissions (n2o) — unfccc?
- Malta ranks 68th and Palau ranks 71st of 73 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Agricultural Soils — Emissions (N2O) — UNFCCC. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf