Belgium vs Laos: Agricultural Soils — Indirect emissions
Agricultural Soils — Indirect emissions over time
- Belgium
- Laos
How they compare
Laos currently reports 1.35 kt against 1.32 kt in Belgium, a difference of 0.03 kt.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Belgium ahead.
Belgium ranks 110th and Laos ranks 108th of 229 countries.
Belgium has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Laos | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1.51 kt | 0.8111 kt | 0.6986 kt | Belgium |
| 2010s | 1.42 kt | 1.1 kt | 0.3144 kt | Belgium |
| 2020s | 1.36 kt | 1.3 kt | 0.0681 kt | Belgium |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher agricultural soils — indirect emissions, Belgium or Laos?
- Laos, at 1.35 kt against 1.32 kt in Belgium as of 2023.
- What is the difference in agricultural soils — indirect emissions between Belgium and Laos?
- 0.03 kt, with Laos ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Laos?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Belgium and Laos rank globally for agricultural soils — indirect emissions?
- Belgium ranks 110th and Laos ranks 108th of 229 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Agricultural Soils — Indirect emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf